Personal Finance Archives - Milton and Cross

Company Liquidation – Pros and Cons

Posted on July 23, 2021July 28, 2021 by admin in Capital, corporate finance, Corporate Governance, corruption, Development, insolvency, investment advisory, Personal Finance, Police and Security

On one hand, company liquidation definitely comes with some advantages, especially when it comes to your current situation.

Leases are cancelled

Terms on lease and hire purchase agreements are generally terminated at the date of liquidation, meaning that no further payments need to be made. If any arrears are owed, the company leasing the goods may be able to claim from the insolvency practitioners along with other creditors. It is worth noting here that personal guarantees are often given upon signing a property lease agreement; you should check your documentation carefully so you know whether you are likely to be made personally responsible for the remainder of the lease.

Avoid court processes

By voluntarily choosing to liquidate the company, you can avoid being petitioned through the courts and be able to demonstrate to the public that liquidation was a company choice rather than a result of hostile creditor action.

Staff can claim redundancy pay

Members of staff will be made redundant by the liquidator, and if eligible, they can start their claim for redundancy pay and other statutory entitlements. If monies realized from the sale of company assets are not sufficient to cover redundancy payments, staff have an alternative route by which to claim what is owed. The National Insurance Trust Fund(NSITF) pays out for redundancy, unpaid wages and holiday pay should the company not be able to do so using its own funds.

Legal action is halted

Any legal action against the company is stopped when the company is in liquidation. Again, as long as you have no personal liability for a company debt, creditors will be unable to take action against you.

Having identified some of the advantages of this type of liquidation, let us now look at the main disadvantages of the process.

Personal liability for debts

Becoming personally liable for company debts can happen if a director has made a personal guarantee against debts of the business. A creditor can enforce the debt if they are unable to reach an agreement for repayment.

If it comes to light that the company has been liquidated quickly, with the sole purpose of avoiding debt repayment, directors may be held personally liable for company debts due to their improper actions.

All assets will be sold

All existing assets will be sold off in order to provide a dividend to creditors where possible, and for the insolvency practitioner to collect their fee.

Staff will be made redundant

As liquidation bring about the end of a company, any staff employed by the business will be made redundant and be forced to look for employment elsewhere. However, depending on their length of service with the business, they may be able to claim statutory redundancy pay following their dismissal.

Explore Our Services

Consult a Free Consultation

Training Bonds: How do they work

Posted on November 20, 2017 by admin in Capital, Corporate Governance, entrepreneurship, International Investment, investment advisory, leadership, Personal Finance, rule of law, Small Businesses, Uncategorized

restrictive-covenant

Captain Dan is a pilot who was formerly in the employment of Highland Airways Ltd. A year before his resignation, the company expended substantial amounts of money in sponsoring 2 specialised trainings for Captain Dan in order to improve his skills and increase the number of planes he could fly.

The terms and conditions for sponsoring the trainings were contained in two training bonds which required Captain Dan to remain in the employment of the Company for 36 months and 12 months respectively. Captain Dan thereafter attended the trainings and acquired licences and qualifications as a result, which made him a desirable candidate for several .

However, contrary to the terms of the training bonds, Captain Dan resigned from the employment of the Company and repudiated the training bonds. He argued that the training bonds were void and unenforceable because they constituted a restraint of trade and an unfair labour practice. The company on the other hand, is of the opinion that the training bonds were freely entered into by the parties and were necessary for the protection of the Company’s business interests. It was further argued that training bonds are not contracts in restraint of trade and are enforceable in Nigeria and other jurisdictions.

This compelled the company to seek legal advice on their right against Captain Dan. Having recourse to international best practice in other jurisdictions, the position of the law is that training bonds are contracts in restraint of trade, but are enforceable if they are considered to be reasonable. The test of reasonableness is whether the restraint is necessary for the protection of the parties’ interest and is not contrary to public policy.

Where the bond is deemed reasonable, the parties can adopt the practice in other jurisdictions where the amount an employer is allowed to recover following a breach of a training bond is limited to the pro-rated cost of the training for the remaining period of the bonding period before the employee breached it. This position of the law provides comfort to employers who incur considerable expenses in providing training for its employees that such investment will be protected by the courts. Arguably, it will also reduce the tendency of employees to flagrantly breach their contractual obligations due to the lure of better offers of employment from their employer’s competitors.

Employers are therefore advised to seek legal advice before drafting their training bonds to be certain that they would pass the test of reasonableness.If a training bond is deemed unreasonably lengthy or restrictive, such as to place the employee in a state of indentured servitude to the employee, the courts may void the legal effect of such an agreement, even though it was freely entered into by the parties.

Should an Employee who was not issued with an Employment letter give a written Notice to Resign?

Posted on November 15, 2017 by admin in Capital, entrepreneurship, investment advisory, Personal Finance, rule of law, Small Businesses, strategy, succession, transaction advisory, Uncategorized, wealth

Amaka started working as an analyst in a commodities brokerage located in Victoria Island. Shortly before her employment, the Human Resources manager had resigned due to a dispute with the senior management. Due to this state of affairs, Amaka was not issued with an employment letter by the company and this state of affairs continued unremedied for the next year as the company searched for another Human Resources manager.

Amaka being a hard worker, was not bothered by the non-issuance of an employment letter, believing that she would prove her worth to the company over time. Moreover, she had been jobless for 2 years after the completion of her national youth service, and she was not going to let a simple matter as the non issuance of an employment letter prevent her from enjoying the fruits of such a juicy job.

Fast forward, and Amaka had worked punishing hours for 3 years under a continuously tense environment worsened by her nasty boss who had been pursuing a vendetta against her for not accepting his lascivious overtures. He had promised to ruin her career and make life difficult for her whilst she remained under his employment. Despite consistently delivering stellar work, she was repeatedly given low grades during performance appraisals and consequently denied promotions. Amaka felt like a slave and was treated almost like one.

A few months later, Amaka received an offer from another investment bank, with considerably better terms of service and benefits. She promptly turned in her 2 weeks notice of resignation and patiently waited for her salary at the end of the month. On the 30th day of the month, she received a letter from the Managing Director informing her that her resignation had been rejected on the grounds that it was company policy that employees were to give 1 (One) clear month’s notice or forfeit their monthly salary in lieu of notice. The letter was delivered by her boss with a malicious smirk on his toad-like face.

Amaka was incensed!!! This was a travesty, and she was not going to allow it. She promptly sought out legal advice on her options against the company.

The position of the law is that an employee has the right to resign with immediate effect, and the rejection of his resignation is tantamount to forced labour, and also against the time-honoured labour law principle that an employer cannot force himself on an unwilling employee. Employees are considered to have given notice of their intention to resign if they unambiguously inform their employers that they will terminate the contract on a certain date.

Furthermore, the Labour Act states that an employer must give an employee a written contract within 3 months of the commencement of the employment. The Labour Act also makes it unlawful for an employer to deduct the salary of employee by way of penalty, except in situations where the employer suffers a loss as a result of the misconduct of the employee.

From the facts there was a failure of Amaka’s employers to provide her with an employment agreement stipulating the terms of her employment, including the process for terminating the employment relationship. The necessary conclusion is that the attempt by the company to withhold her salary on the grounds of non-adherence to company policy falls flat on the failure of the company to comply with the provisions of the Labour Act. The absence of an express requirement for 1 month notice implies that the employment relationship could be terminated at will. Consequently Amaka’s resignation is valid at law, and she can enforce her right to the withheld salary against the company by a suit at the National industrial Court.

Investing in Renovating and Selling homes

Posted on October 18, 2017 by admin in Capital, corporate finance, Development, estate planning, International Investment, investment advisory, Personal Finance, real estate, Small Businesses, strategy, succession, transaction advisory, Uncategorized, upscale, wealth

null_zpsaf60ba93

Balogun is a banker approaching his 55th birthday. After a 30 year career as a banker, and seeing several people make their fortunes in real estate, he has decided to become a real estate investor.

His plan is to invest in underpriced property, with the objective of renovating the buildings and selling the individual units at a higher value than the amount at which he purchased the property. Balogun is interested in understanding the risks and opportunities of this business and he comes to us for advice.

Some things to note:

Using this strategy, you purchase a building that needs fixing up for N2,750,000 and then you invest N500,000 in improvements (paint, landscaping, appliances, decorator items, and so on) and you also invest the amount of sweat equity that suits your skills and wallet. You now have one of the nicer homes in the neighborhood, and 2 years later you can sell this home for a net price of N4,000,000 after your transaction costs.

small_1376440841-og_living_after — After

Be sure to buy a home in need of that special TLC in a great neighborhood. With most properties, the long-term appreciation is what drives your returns. Consider keeping homes you buy and improve as long-term investment properties.
before

After
This strategy is clearly not for everyone interested in making money from real estate investments. It is not advisable if you’re unwilling or reluctant to live through redecorating, minor remodeling, or major construction;

You may not be experienced or comfortable enough with identifying undervalued property and improving it; so always make sure you get a professional opinion on each property .

You should either have the budget to hire a professional contractor to do the work, or you should have the free time or the home improvement skills needed to enhance the value of a home.
You also need a financial cushion to withstand a significant downturn in your local real estate market, as this investment can be very cost intensive.
Mange your risks as much as possible!!! Make sure you do deep due diligence on the property in order to ensure that you have good title to transfer to a third party, especially since it may not make financial sense to perfect your title if you are not going to hold the property for a long period.

How can you transfer your music copyrights?

Posted on August 1, 2017 by admin in corporate finance, entertainment, entrepreneurship, International Investment, investment advisory, Personal Finance, real estate, rule of law, Uncategorized

b5369ae73f12204464fef1de98c14a66

Wale is a music producer. Recently he composed music for a hit track which enjoyed substantial airplay for over 6 months. Consequent upon the success of his track, he was approached by an international music corporation, who requested him to transfer his copyright in the music to the company in return for a one off payment of $200,000 and royalties capped at 5% of global sales for the next 2 years. They assured him that he would enjoy more concert appearances with the allied revenue streams. Wale is confused and requires advice on his legal rights.

Of all the forms of copyright protected works, music is perhaps the most restricted and licensed. Since music was first broadcast on radio, a vast mechanism for licensing music has emerged from the opposing forces of the recording industry and the radio and TV broadcasting industries.

Copyright ownership can be transferred like any other form of property. Copyright is transmissible by assignment, by testamentary disposition, operation of law, as personal or moveable property. however, to give legal effect to that transmission there must be a written agreement signed by the assignor. Any grant by the copyright owner binds every successor in title except a bona-fide purchaser for value without notice (actual or constructive).

This doesn’t however mean that a copyright cannot be transferred verbally, as it is trite law that a verbal agreement to which both parties have agreed all the terms (i.e. has reached completion) is legally binding. It follows then that a verbal agreement to assign, provided there is no dispute as to the terms of the assignment between the assignor and assignee, is valid and copyright is transmissible by operation of basic contract. It is however advisable that the parties sign a confirmatory assignment agreement which refers retrospectively to the earlier assignment.

The transfer could be partial or total, where the rights owner can transfer all of the exclusive rights his or her grants. In partial assignment, a music author may transfer his reproduction, translation and adaptation rights to a publisher. He may also decide to split his rights between different persons.

Copyright assignment agreements can be limited in terms of duration or territory. The author of a literary work could, for example, assign their right to reproduce it in the UK, Nigeria, Ghana and the Gambia for 4 years.

Copyright assignment agreements can be reversionary, in other words, the rights can revert back to the assignor on the occurrence of an uncertain event, such as an unremedied breach of contract. This protects the assignor from the loss of their rights in the event of the occurrence of certain events which may be vitiate the transfer contract.

The transfer of copyrights contains some knotty issues, which could become highly problematic if not properly managed. When faced with a decision on copyrights, it is best that you seek advice from a qualified legal practitioner, so as to ensure that you take the best steps in the circumstances.

Milton & Cross Solicitors provides advice to entertainers, rights owners, rights administrators and merchandisers. We help them make informed decisions that facilitate high value transactions. Contact us for a free consultation.

ARE SALARY DEDUCTIONS LAWFUL?

Posted on July 6, 2017 by admin in Capital, Compliance, Corporate Governance, entrepreneurship, investment advisory, Personal Finance, rule of law, Uncategorized, upscale, wealth

security-destroying-old-bank-cheque-guarantee-card-by-cutting-in-half-a6nrm5

Donald owns a golf course business run through a company called Great Ltd. The business is performing poorly and there are significantly fewer customers than last year. Donald takes the view that this is the fault of his employees. He decides he will ‘make the business great again’ by firing staff or deducting their salaries.

Donald has never liked one particular employee called Bernard. As Bernard is doing his usual maintenance work on the golf course, Donald walks up and asks him aggressively why he is not working faster. Before he can answer, Donald states that he is going to deduct 20% of Bernard’s salary!!!

Fast forward to the end of the month, Bernard receives his pay check and notices that indeed 20% had been deducted from his salary, after taxes! he was so infuriated and reported the matter to this line manager, who after giving him the runaround, informed him that the order to deduct his salary came directly from Donald. Understanding that he can achieve no objective by working with the company hierarchy, Bernard seeks legal advice on his options.

As a general rule, Under the Labour Act LFN 2004, all amounts payable to an employee in relation to the performance of work must be paid in legal tender and periodically. It should be noted that the Act does not not govern the amount or periodicity of wages, but merely stipulates that the terms should be reduced into writing by the employer.

There are very specific provisions in the Act regarding the circumstances when an employer can make deductions from an employee’s wage or salary and it is important for employers to understand their obligations.

S.5 (1) of the Labour Act provides that except where expressly permitted by law or where loss or injury has been caused to the employer by the wilful misconduct or neglect of the worker, no employer shall make any deduction or make any agreement or contract with a worker for any deduction from the wages or any other moneys to be paid by the employer to the worker, for or in respect of any fines. This suggests that the use of wage deductions as a punitive or disciplinary measure is to a large extent unlawful.

Allowable deductions include;

Pension
Personal Income Tax
Union contributions, where the worker has accepted in writing to make voluntary contributions to the trade Union
Over payment of wages, but only in respect of any such over payment made during the three months immediately preceding the month in which the over payment was discovered.
Deductions which have been expressly approved by the worker, e.g Cooperative contributions, judgment debts which have been duly garnished by the judgement creditor or loan payments due to a 3rd party. The written authorisation from the employee must specify the amount of the deduction and may be withdrawn or varied, in writing, by the employee at any time.
Deductions for goods or services provided by an employer, or a related party to the employer, to an employee in the ordinary course of the employer’s business, and which are provided on terms and conditions that are the same as, or not more favourable than, to the general public.
A deduction which is to recover costs directly incurred by the employer as a result of the employee’s voluntary private use of particular property of the employer, whether the use is authorised or not. e.g cost of items purchased on a corporate credit card for personal use by the employee, cost of personal calls on a company mobile phone

However, it is possible that a situation may arise where the salary of the worker is tied to their work product, in which case, the suspension of an employee’s employment may not be viewed as a salary deduction.

Employers need to be very cautious in effecting payroll deductions,understanding that there is a distinction between a “belief” that there is a right to recover money from an employee, a legal right to recover money from an employee, and the method that the employer can ultimately use to recover any money.

The Law does not simply permit an employer to take the easy option of making a deduction from the employee’s future wages or salary to recovery money which the employee owes the employer.

Further, employers should be cautious in simply seeking to rely on any general deduction wording in their employment contracts. Despite such contractual wording, an employee’s express written authorisation of a specific amount will still be required, unless the deduction is properly authorised by an industrial instrument, legislation or court order.

In addition, employers are prohibited from requiring employees to spend any part of their payment in relation to the performance of work where the requirement is unreasonable. Where employees are required to wear a particular brand or type of clothing and are required to purchase that clothing, then that requirement has to be reasonable to be enforceable and not be in breach of the Act.

Employers should seek professional advice if unsure about the lawfulness of a payroll deduction for the employer’s benefit, BEFORE proceeding, as an unlawful deduction may attract a civil penalty under the Act.

The Legality of Restrictive Covenants

Posted on May 30, 2017 by admin in Capital, investment advisory, Personal Finance, real estate, Small Businesses, strategy, Uncategorized, wealth

If there is a restrictive covenant in effect in the agreement that was signed, the homeowner is not able to do just whatever he or she wants to the land or house. These documents are drafted with specific language in the deed papers or through additional files that specify certain actions for the deed. They have working of running with the land so that anyone that owns the property is affected by the terms.

The purpose of a restrictive covenant is to limit the ability to freely use the property by someone that owns it. These may be placed on deeds by municipalities, land developers and even homeowner’s associations when certain actions are not wanted in a neighborhood or community. It is possible for a private citizen to also impose these restrictions when entering into these contracts so that imposed limitations affect the new owner. The primary reason for these stipulations is to keep the location in order in regard to certain actions such as cleanliness and appearance. The other goal is to increase the property values as much as possible for the entire area.

Community Association

There is a percentage of homeowners that believe that community association has rules that only lower property values based on the regulations implemented. However, most of those included in these organizations are happy and at peace with ensuring the rules are followed. Restrictive covenants may be used as a design to maintain the character of developing land and communities. This may prevent residents from various alterations to the homes in regard to size, appearance and the trees and brush around them. Because being part of a community requires adherence to these regulations, each person must follow the rules. However, homeowners are able to change some of these when they are in good standing with the Housing association.

Due Diligence Before Purchase

There are a variety of sources where restrictions come from on what may be done to the property. This could be the developer when the property is a condo or some building still being constructed. The list of detailed restrictions is provided before the sale in most circumstances so the buyer is aware of these conditions before he or she moves into the home. The title committeemen document is another source of finding the limitations through a restrictive covenant when purchasing a house. The title company usually has these details noted for any limitations that apply to the land or structure that is purchased. A local county deed recorder may supply this information if a title insurance policy is not obtained when the property has been bought. Any applicable restrictive covenants are placed on the face of a property deed as a public record available to anyone. For any additional assistance, a real estate lawyer should be contacted.

Restrictive Covenant Examples

The terms of a restrictive covenant are usually detailed and obvious. This is usually for home bought within certain communities. A covenant affects how high, where and what manner of construction may be accomplished for certain portions of the property. Some require a permit for painting or for decorations. Pets and certain other stipulations such as running a home business may be restricted. Altering the landscape is often limited. Other exclusions may be through adding fences, multiple or large vehicles and materials such as window treatments or solar panels.

Violations and Legal Assistance to Restrictive Covenants

When a homeowner violates a restrictive covenant, the consequences may be as minor as a fine or as severe as suspension of rights on the property. It is imperative that these terms and clauses are fully understood before the homeowner finalizes the purchase of the house or land. To accomplish this, a real estate lawyer should be hired to analyze the wording and how it applies to the purchase. These legal professionals have the knowledge and understanding of how local and state restrictions for both the title and laws affect these terms. Restrictive covenants must be examined thoroughly by a real estate lawyer to ensure what the homeowner wants to do may be done so after he or she buys the property.

The Biggest Mistakes Entrepreneurs Make when Hiring Business Lawyers.

Posted on May 18, 2017 by admin in Capital, Compliance, Corporate Governance, Development, entertainment, entrepreneurship, International Investment, investment advisory, leadership, Personal Finance, real estate, rule of law, Small Businesses, strategy, Uncategorized, upscale, wealth

I do not pay my lawyers to tell me what I cannot do, but to tell me how to do what I want to do.

J.P.Morgan

Ikenna is a brilliant programmer and all round tech whiz. in 2015, he designed a classified listings website called TRUGG, which drew public attention and commercial success due to its user centered design and simplicity of use, as well as its global reach.

However, As his company grew rapidly, so did the rate of lawsuits filed against the company. Aggrieved users, competitors and random individuals would file cases against the company, costing the company millions of Naira in time, legal costs and settlements. After a few years of fielding these cases, Ikenna decided to seek advice from Joe, a fellow successful tech entrepreneur, on the desirability or otherwise of retaining a commercial lawyer for his business.

A good business attorney, when fully embraced and informed, guides the company and its management on all touch points- products, services, communications, investor relations and customer service. Your lawyer will provide vital assistance in almost every aspect of your business, from formal business incorporation to basic compliance, copyright and trademark advice, and civil, contractual, or criminal liability arising from the activities of the company.

Most small businesses put off hiring a lawyer until the sheriff is standing at the door serving them with a summons. Bad mistake. The time to hook up with a good business lawyer is before you are sued. It’s easy to get into court, but very difficult and expensive to get out once you’ve been “trapped”. Once you have been served with a summons, it’s too late–the problem has already occurred, and it’s just a question of how much you will have to pay (in court costs, lawyers’ fees, settlements and other expenses) to get the problem resolved.

A good commercial law firm should be ideally able to handle your lawsuits, negotiate your lease of office or retail space, file a patent or trademark, draft a software license agreement, advise you on terminating a disruptive employee, and oversee your corporate annual meeting.

For many entrepreneurs, the idea of consulting a lawyer conjures up frightening visions of skyrocketing legal bills. The fee a lawyer will charge to keep you out of trouble is only a small fraction of the fee a lawyer will charge to get you out of trouble once it’s happened. When you hire an attorney, ensure you draw up an agreement (called an “engagement letter”) detailing the billing method to be applied and also specifying what expenses you’re expected to reimburse. This saves from conflicts arising from billings and requests for reimbursements.

Your lawyer should tell you what the law says and explain how it affects the way you do business so that you can spot problems well in advance. However, you should note that no lawyer can possibly know everything about every area of law. If your business has specialized legal needs (a graphic designer, for example, may need someone who is familiar with copyright laws), your attorney should either be familiar with that special area or have a working relationship with someone who is.

You should be able to communicate openly and freely with your attorney at all times. Good looks and a dynamic personality are not as important in a lawyer as accuracy, thoroughness, intelligence, the willingness to work hard for you and attention to detail. Look out for a lawyer who believes in your business and who is willing to go above and beyond the call of duty in managing the risks of your business and resolving any issues that may arise before they start.

Investing in Lagos Real Estate Companies: The Pros and Cons

Posted on May 3, 2017 by admin in Capital, corporate finance, Development, entrepreneurship, estate planning, International Investment, investment advisory, mergers and acquisitions, Personal Finance, real estate, Small Businesses, strategy, transaction advisory, Uncategorized

eleko-photos-055

Okeke trades in furniture and fittings at a major market in Onitsha. In addition to his business, he owns a substantial number of houses within Onitsha and environs. One day whilst attending an exhibition in Lagos, he was approached by a young marketer for a real estate company; the marketer had been tasked to sell some real estate located around the Lekki Free Zone and Okeke looked like the perfect buyer.

The marketer launched into a seductive pitch about the prospects of the area and the opportunity for amassing immense profits, especially due to the development of a refinery in the area by a major investor and industrialist. As a businessman with an eye for profit, Okeke was intrigued by the opportunity to multiply his capital, but he requested for time to seek advice from his lawyers before investing the substantial amount required, especially having heard horrible stories of the dreadful omonile and their penchant for violence in land matters.

There has been a boom in investment in vacant real estate over the past decade; however this boom seems to be driven by certain misconceptions which have been fed by advertising campaigns and the mass media. This misconception is that land values appreciate at a rate which exceeds rates of return on alternative investments such as treasury bills, stock or other asset classes. These misconceptions have led to the growth of a speculative bubble which seems to have driven the costs of real estate beyond reasonable levels.

In general, by investing in developing the land you may destroy an option and at the same time you may create other options. Vacant land represents an option of retaining it in its vacant form and expecting an increase in value of the land, or turning the vacant land into a development, thereby increasing its intrinsic potential for value creation through the injection of capital. The computation of the value of land requires the calculation of current and future construction costs, as well as current and future market prices of real estate in the area where the land is located.

Prior to purchasing land, it is pertinent to have an idea of the use to which the land is to be put, including the proposed structures which are to be constructed upon the land and the market prices or rental values such structures would fetch in the future based on the surrounding properties in the area. In calculating the values of the property, provision should be made for the probability that the property may fall in value in the future.

It would be wise for Okeke to first conduct a search on the title of the sellers, especially since a number of real estate marketing companies do not perfect their title before commencing the sale of the properties, a situation worsened . This will protect him from any nasty surprise which may arise from defects in the title of the seller. These companies sometimes acquire their holdings by sponsoring the perimeter survey or excision (popularly known as gazette) of property belonging to a community. This implies that several of these properties have defective title from the beginning and should not be purchased if possible.

After ascertaining that the sellers hold good title to the property, Okeke should ask for all the charges and costs arising from the purchase of the property. This is because a number of real estate companies add certain fees and levies to the cost of the estate, ostensibly for the development of the estate, although several fail to use the funds for any such purposes. Their refusal to develop the estate often slows the pace of development within the estate, as well as the rate of appreciation for properties within the estate

We hope these tips will prove useful to you as you begin to navigate the world of real estate investment. For further information and consultancy, we may be contacted directly on +2348036258312, or by email on : info@miltoncrosslexng.com.

More Real Estate Investment Strategies that will Make you Rich 2

Posted on February 22, 2017 by admin in corporate finance, Development, estate planning, International Investment, Personal Finance, real estate, Small Businesses, transaction advisory, Uncategorized

Flipping Real Estate

Flipping

Outside Nigeria, flipping houses is one of the more popular tactics for making money in real estate, due largely to the numerous shows on cable TV that promote it. House flipping is the practice of buying a piece of real estate at a discounted price, improving it in some way, and then selling it for a financial gain. In reality, the flipping model is quite similar to the “buy low, sell high” model of most retail businesses.

The most popular type of property to flip is the single family home. Following a rule of thumb known as the 70% rule, an experienced house flipper will buy a home for 70% of its current value less any rehab costs. For example: Home A should be worth N1,000,000 if it were in good condition, but it needs N200,000 worth of work. A typical house flipper will purchase the home for N500,000 (N1,000,000 x 70% – N200,000) and seek to sell it for the full N1,000,000 when completed. This is simply a rule of thumb, and actual numbers must be verified by a qualified construction expert and adjusted to ensure a successful and profitable flip.

Flipping is not a “passive” activity, but instead is just like an active day job. When an investor stops flipping, they stop making money until they begin flipping again. Many investors choose to use flipping to fund their day-to-day bills, as well as provide financial support for other, more passive investments.