Workman’s compensation under Nigerian Law

The potential dangers of the workplace, especially in the construction, manufacturing, extractive industries and mining sectors has necessitated the provision of measures to ensure that an injured workman is adequately compensated for loss of employment and loss of income arising from workplace related injuries. Unfortunately, workers are often left to the whims and caprices of their employers, who in most cases treat their welfare with levity.

Early industrial employment conditions saw men and women workers receiving low wages, enduring long work hours, serving in hazardous job sites, and suffering from discrimination (including sexual harassment). Child labor was also prevalent. These issues led laborers to organize protests or to negotiate for just rewards and safe work environments.

When the International Labor Organization (ILO) was established in 1919, member-countries signed conventions that aimed “to promote rights at work, encourage decent employment opportunities, enhance social protection and strengthen dialogue in handling work-related issues.” The ILO encourages tripartism where representatives from state governments, employer organizations, and labor groups participate in consultations to identify ideal labor standards and policies. Later on, the ILO strengthened its campaign through its Decent Work Agenda (DWA). The DWA promotes fair and rights-based trade globalization to fight poverty.

Aside from compassionate employers and labor friendly political leaders, much credit in the evolution of a humane workplace goes to labor unions whose collective efforts resulted in many benefits for men and women workers in general. Through gaining political and legislative leverage, they successfully asserted their right to organize and collectively bargain for better work conditions. These include reduced work hours, wage increases, grievance and arbitration procedures, provisions for occupational safety and health, paid vacation and sick leaves, death and medical benefits, retirement pensions, and non-discriminatory policies on gender, religion, age, and race, among others.

The Federal Government of Nigeria, in compliance with its ratification of the ILO convention and its obligations thereunder,enacted the Workmen Compensation Act (1987) to provide for compensation for workmen injured in the course of their employment. This legislation, which was the first of its kind in Nigeria, sought to incorporate international standards relating to workmen’s compensation and cater for the welfare of injured workmen. This Act was however bedeviled by issues, which hampered its effectiveness in securing compensation for injured employees, thus necessitating a review of the law.
The Employees Compensation Act (2010) repealed the Workman’s Compensation Act and sought to flaws in the WCA. The Act is applicable to all government and private employees including the Nigeria Police Force, members of the diplomatic corps of Nigeria and members of various Para-military and security outfits in Nigeria.
NOTABLE FEATURES OF THE ECA (2010)
1. The ECA (2010) by re-labeling the ‘Workman’ (a term derived from the Feudal Master/Servant relationship) to ‘Employee’, covers a broader spectrum of persons employed and paid for the execution of specific or general duties by an employer.The enlarged definition also includes independent contractors and sub-contractors; however, staff falling within this category are expected to contribute jointly
2. The ECA empowers the National Social Insurance Trust Fund Management Board established under the  National Social Insurance Trust Fund Act (1993) with the administration and management of Employees compensation and the Employees Compensation Fund created by the Act. This improves upon the erstwhile situation, where an administrative vacuum existed in the administration of Employee Compensation.
3.The ECA establishes a specific fund (containing a take off grant from government, employers contribution of 1% of monthly payroll, fees and assessments charged pursuant to the Act, proceeds of investment of the fund, gift and grants from any national or international organisation, and any funds that may accrue), from which compensations are paid to injured employees upon application. This serves to ensure and guarantee that injured employees are not left at the mercy of their employers or their insurers,but rather guarantees adequate compensations to injured employees, the validity of whose claims have been proven.
4. In order for an employee to be entitled to compensation under the ECA, they must have suffered the injury in the course of their employment, meaning that the employee must have been engaged in the duties for which they were employed, or doing something ancillary to, or incidental to such duties. This extend to accidents suffered between the employee’s place of work and principal/secondary residence, Accidents occurring where the employee usually takes his meals and accidents occurring at the place where the employee usually receives his remuneration.
5. In order to be entitled to Compensation under the ECA, the Employee only needs to establish the fact of injury in the place of employment, there is no need to establish negligence or breach of statutory duty on the part of the employer.
6. Notice must be given to the employer within 14 days of the occurrence of the injury or death; either by the employee himself or by his dependants. The notice should include the name of the employee, time and place of the occurrence, and the nature and cause of the injury (if known). Failure to deliver the notice shall act as a bar to any claims for compensation unless the employer had full knowledge of the disease or injuries, the information though insufficient is adequate to describe the disease or the injuries, or where the justice of the case requires otherwise.
.

TRENDS IN TOBACCO REGULATION

 

 

Tobacco-associated today with smoking of cigarettes, cigars and pipes, as well as snuff and chewing, has been attacked by social observers and medical authorities for the damage it has allegedly done, to the social and physical condition of man.

On the one hand, proponents of the leaf stress its social benefits and its economic and industrial significance. Some enthusiasts even endorse its alleged medical and psychological benefits. Opposed are those who cite the health hazards of smoking and others who are convinced of its immorality.

Tobacco once formed the basis of the economy for the colonies of Virginia and Carolina and it was used to purchase the indentured servants and slaves to cultivate it, to pay local taxes and tithes, and to buy manufactured goods from England. Promissory notes payable in tobacco were even used as currency, with the cost of almost every commodity, from servants to wives, given in pounds of tobacco.

The effect of smoking on health has been the subject of discussion for hundreds of years. Early participants in the tobacco controversy, beginning in the late 16th century, did not associate the use of tobacco with the production of cancers although they credited it with causing or curing nearly every other known disease.  In the 16th century, smoking was considered to have medicinal value. Juan de Cardenas, a Spanish physician who lived in Mexico in the late 1500’s, wrote that “Soldiers subject to privations, kept off cold, hunger, and thirst by smoking and all the inhabitants of the hot countries of the Indies alleviate their discomforts by the smoke of this blessed and medicinal weed“. However, in 1939, the first scientific study linking lung cancer with smoking was published. Between 1950 and 1954, 14 studies associating cigarettes and serious diseases were completed and upon the recommendation of an Advisory Committee established by the Surgeon-General of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission concluded that cigarette advertising was deceptive (misleading) and that advertisers had a responsibility to warn the public of the health hazards of cigarette smoking.

Tobacco control programs aim to reduce disease, disability, and death related to tobacco use. Tobacco control laws and other government policies generally aim to:

  • Prevent people, particularly children and youth, from starting to use tobacco
  • Help people quit using tobacco products
  • Reduce the harmful effects caused by tobacco use

Motivations for regulatory controls of Tobacco have ranged from Public health considerations, quantity and quality control, protecting the market from unfair competition, environmental protection, monopoly creation or disruption, and deceptive advertising. The view has been expressed that a comprehensive approach—one that includes educational, clinical, regulatory, economic, and social strategies— may be  the best way to eliminate the negative health and economic effects of tobacco use. In our next article, we will analyse the Nigerian Tobacco Control Act 2015 in order to determine its effectiveness in the regulation of tobacco within Nigeria.

Stay Safe